Service matter concerning seniority and promotions; the Court directed notice to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 with affidavit of service, recorded counsel's statement that newly promoted persons need not be impleaded, and adjourned the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Trupti 1 16-wp-1002-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1002 OF 2024
Gaurav Pradip Palsule … Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents
Mr.S.S.Panchpor for the Petitioner.
Mr.B.V.Samant, Addl.GP with Mr.M.M.Pabale, AGP for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &
M.M.SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 30 JANUARY 2024
P.C.:
The Petitioner will give notice to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and file affidavit of service.
TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE
Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2024.02.01 12:47:21 +0530
(M.M.SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Gaurav Pradip Palsule
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
M.M. Sathaye
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
