Hemant Kumar Mishra v. Vivek Chawla
Case brief
What is this about?
Common administrative order adjourning a batch of matters that could not be heard for want of time. Office objections to be removed within two weeks, interim orders to continue, and the matters were given dates for admission and urgent orders.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nikita .. 1 .. COMMON ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
& ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
NIKITAKAILASDARADE Digitallysigned byNIKITAKAILASDARADEDate:2024.12.2016:00:40+0530
DATE :- 19th DECEMBER, 2024
Per Court :-
- At the time of rising, the matters mentioned in the chart in
paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
- In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
- The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed
Coram
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Mehta Building Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) vs State of Maharashtra
Bnc Power Projects Limited vs Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. through Its Chairman and Managing Director
Devi Constructions Limited Liability Partnership vs State of Maharashtra through the Revenue and Forest Dep and Ors.
Vasant Shamji Kenia vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary Home Dep.