Dr. Rishika Sahagal v. Prakash Gangaram Jadhav
Case brief
What is this about?
Group of writ petitions by occupants of unauthorised hutments on municipal land at Pratiksha Nagar, Sion, resisting relocation for a BMC water pipeline and tunnel project. The Court considered interim protection, a developer's slum-rehabilitation proposal involving pipeline realignment, and sought BMC instructions on appointing a Court Receiver.
What the court decided
903-904-OSWP-3869-2021+F.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3869 OF 2021
Prakash Gangaram Jadhav & Ors …Petitioners Versus
Assistant Engineer, Maintenance Department, …Respondents MCGM Office & Ors
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 435 OF 2024
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3869 OF 2021
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.04.08 13:33:38 +0530
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Should a Court Receiver be appointed over the site and hutments at Pratiksha Nagar, Sion to preserve status quo pending resolution?
Whether relocation options offered to hutment dwellers for a BMC water-infrastructure project are reasonable under Articles 14 and 21?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prakash Gangaram Jadhav & Ors
- petitioner
Jitendra Damodar Jadhav & Ors
- petitioner
Jitendra Dharma Pandav & Ors
- petitioner
Sylvester Anthony Fernandes
- petitioner
Yussuf Gafar Sayyad & Ors
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court