Disposed

Mangaldas Dayaram Bokade v. the Scheduled Tribes Caste Scrutiny Committee, through Its Member Secretary, Nagpur and Another

Bombay HC13 Aug 2024CAW/2121/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Tribe claim of Halba was invalidated; petitioner did not press the challenge but sought placement on a supernumerary post under a 2019 government resolution. Court allowed amendment and directed education authorities to decide on the Management's pending recommendation within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Amendment permitted; Education Officer, Bhandara and Deputy Director of Education, Nagpur Division directed to decide the recommended supernumerary post claim within eight weeks.

Mangaldas Dayaram Bokade vs the Scheduled Tribes Caste… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:8970-DB

¶2

1 06-wp 1739.2018.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2121 OF 2024 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 1739 OF 2018

¶6

( Mangaldas Dayaram Bokade vs. The Scheduled Tribes Caste Scrutiny Committee through its Member Secretary, Nagpur and another )

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

¶8

Mr.P.R.Parsodkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.H.D.Marathe, Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent No.1.

¶9

Mr.A.Z.Jibhkate, Advocate for respondent No.2.

¶10

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 13, 2024

¶11

The tribe claim of the petitioner as that of belonging to “Halba” (Scheduled Tribe) came to be negated vide impugned order dated 17/02/2018 passed by the respondent No.1 Committee.

¶12

Mr.Parsodkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner has not pressed the petition to the said extent i.e. challenge to the order of invalidation. However, through the present application a prayer is made by the petitioner that his services be placed on a supernumerary post in view of the policy of the State Government reflected in Government Resolution dated 21/12/2019.

¶13

We deem it appropriate to allow the said application. As such, we permit the petitioner to carry out amendment to the petition within a period of one week.

¶14

2 06-wp 1739.2018.odt

¶15

In response to the claim put forth about placing the services of the petitioner on a supernumerary post, the respondent No.2 Management has already recommended the candidature of the petitioner which is pending for consideration with the Education Officer(Secondary), Bhandara.

¶16

That being so, we dispose of the petition by directing the Education Officer, Bhandara so also the Deputy Director of Education, Nagpur Division to deal with the claim of the petitioner recommended by the respondent No.2 Management for placing the services of the petitioner on a supernumerary post. Let the decision be communicated to the petitioner and the Management within a period of eight weeks from today.

¶17

( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) ( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. )

¶18

KOLHE

¶19

Signed by: Mr. Ravikant Kolhe Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 14/08/2024 15:45:36

Mangaldas Dayaram Bokade v. the Scheduled Tribes Caste Scrutiny Committee, through Its Member Secretary, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mangaldas Dayaram Bokade v. the Scheduled Tribes Caste Scrutiny Committee, through Its Member Secretary, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alpansankhyank Majur Kamgar Saha. Sanstha Marya., Thr. President, Irshad Shah Maqubool Shah Vs the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Amravati and Others

Jijau Commercial Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Amravati Thr. Its Authorized Officer, Shailesh P. Yadav Vs the District Magistrate/Collector, Amravati and Others

Ku. Praniti Nilkanthrao Pusadakar and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Mumbai and Others

Ajmayyenur Raheem Ashfaque Raheem vs State of Maha., Thr. Principal Secretary, Dept. of School and Sports, Mumbai and Ors.

Shekhar S/O Anil Pawar vs the S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Member Secretary and Dy. Director, Amravati

Sunanda W/O. Manohar Bhusari and Others vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Dept. of Urban Development, Mumbai and Others