Disposed

Jijau Commercial Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Amravati Thr. Its Authorized Officer, Shailesh P. Yadav v. the District Magistrate/Collector, Amravati and Others

Bombay HC12 Aug 2024WP/2381/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, directed the District Magistrate/Collector, Amravati to decide the pending application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act filed by the petitioner within six weeks from the date of production of the order copy.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the District Magistrate/Collector, Amravati to decide the pending Section 14 application within six weeks from the date of production of the order copy.

Jijau Commercial Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Amravati Thr. Its… — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:8854-DB

¶2

24-WP-2381-2024.odt 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.2381 of 2024

¶5

Jijau Commercial Co-operative Bank Ltd.
vs.

¶6

The District Magistrate/Collector, Amravati and others.

¶7

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order

¶8

Mr. G.R.Sadar, Advocate for petitioner.
Ms N. P. Mehta, Additional Government Pleader for respondent no.1.
Mr. P. S.Patil, Advocate for respondent nos.2 to 5.

¶9

CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE :- 12th AUGUST, 2024

¶10

Heard.

¶11

2.We have perused the order dated 28.11.2019 passed by the
respondent no.1 in exercise of power under Section 14 of the
Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, the
SARFAESI Act).

¶12

3.It appears that the order dated 28.11.2019 was an interim
arrangement.

¶13

4.The fact remains that the application under Section 14 of
the SARFAESI Act filed by the petitioner is not decided till this
date by the said Authority.

¶14

5.That being so, we deem it appropriate to direct

¶15

the respondent no.1 to decide the application moved by the

¶16

24-WP-2381-2024.odt 2

¶17

petitioner under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act as expeditiously
as possible and in any case within a period of six weeks from the
date of production of copy of this order.

¶18

6. With these directions the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶19

No costs.

¶20

 (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶21

Andurkar.

Jijau Commercial Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Amravati Thr. Its Authorized Officer, Shailesh P. Yadav v. the District Magistrate/Collector, Amravati and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jijau Commercial Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Amravati Thr. Its Authorized Officer, Shailesh P. Yadav v. the District Magistrate/Collector, Amravati and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lata Natthuji Salve and Others Vs Western Coalfields Ltd. Thr. Chief General Manager, Chandrapur and Others

Baldev Maujilal Gadge Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and Others

Laxman Manikrao Tonge Vs Union of India, through Its Secretary, Department of Home, New Delhi (Deleted) and Others

Alpansankhyank Majur Kamgar Saha. Sanstha Marya., Thr. President, Irshad Shah Maqubool Shah Vs the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Amravati and Others

Ku. Praniti Nilkanthrao Pusadakar and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Mumbai and Others

Mayur S/O Anil Pawar Vs the S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Member Secretary and Dy. Director, Amravati