Disposed

Ku. Praniti Nilkanthrao Pusadakar and Others v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC12 Aug 2024WP/4373/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court, relying on prior judgments in Ranjana M. Dhokane and Sachin S. Tambakhe cases, disposed of the writ petition. It directed respondents to consider the petitioners' claim for transfer from difficult terrain to other terrains with available vacancies, as they had completed their tenure.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioners' claim for transfer from difficult terrain to other terrain with vacancies.

Ku. Praniti Nilkanthrao Pusadakar and Others Vs State… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:8856-DB

¶2

34-WP-4373-2024.odt 1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.4373 of 2024

¶5

Ku. Praniti Nilkanthrao Pusadakar and others

¶6

vs.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and others.

¶8

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders
or directions and Registrar's order

¶9

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr S.S.Dhengale, Advocate for petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Hrishikesh Marathe, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent no.1.

¶11

CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE :- 12th AUGUST, 2024

¶12

None appears for the respondent nos. 2 to 4 though served.

¶13

2. It is brought to our notice by the learned counsel appearing

¶14

for the petitioners that the issue sought to be canvased in this
petition is covered by the judgment delivered in Writ Petition No.
262 of 2024 (Ranjana M. Dhokane vs. State of Maharashtra and
others) decided on 15.03.2024 and the order dated 31.01.2023
passed in Writ Petition No. 7667 of 2022 (Sachin S. Tambakhe
and ors. vs. State of Maharashtra and others) with connected writ
petitions.

¶15

3.Since the contention is not controverted by the
respondents, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ
petition in terms of the said orders thereby directing the
respondent nos. 1 to 4 to consider the claim of the petitioners for

¶16

34-WP-4373-2024.odt 2

¶17

their transfer in accordance with law from difficult terrain to any
other terrain where the vacancies are available as they having
been completed the tenure in difficult terrain.

¶18

4. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶19

 (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶20

Andurkar.

Ku. Praniti Nilkanthrao Pusadakar and Others v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ku. Praniti Nilkanthrao Pusadakar and Others v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Rural Development, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lata Natthuji Salve and Others Vs Western Coalfields Ltd. Thr. Chief General Manager, Chandrapur and Others

Baldev Maujilal Gadge Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Divisional Commissioner, Amravati and Others

Laxman Manikrao Tonge Vs Union of India, through Its Secretary, Department of Home, New Delhi (Deleted) and Others

Alpansankhyank Majur Kamgar Saha. Sanstha Marya., Thr. President, Irshad Shah Maqubool Shah Vs the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Amravati and Others

Jijau Commercial Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Amravati Thr. Its Authorized Officer, Shailesh P. Yadav Vs the District Magistrate/Collector, Amravati and Others

Mayur S/O Anil Pawar Vs the S.T. Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Member Secretary and Dy. Director, Amravati