The Court dismissed a second appeal for non-appearance. Consequently, the pending civil application was disposed of. No substantive legal proposition is extracted.
Appeal and Civil Application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35-SA-431-2018.doc
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO.431 OF 2018
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.230 OF 2018 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.431 OF 2018
The State Of Maharashtra
(Through the Collector, Nashik)
...Appellants/ Applicants
Versus
Jyoti Deepak Jadhav & Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Appellant/Applicant.
Mr. Kunal M. Damle for Respondent No. 1 to 3.
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : JANUARY 24, 2024
P. C. :
and by way of last chance. Today also none appears on behalf of the State.
survives for consideration and same is disposed of as such.
(SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. )
1/1
The State Of Maharashtra (Through the Collector, Nashik)
Jyoti Deepak Jadhav
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
