Interim application in a second appeal seeking to bring on record the heirs of deceased respondent no.1; the court allowed the application with amendment within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14 Ia-18117-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 18117 OF 2023
[e-fling] IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 472 OF 2016
Pravin Parshuram Rahate
...Appellants.
Versus
Smt. Pratibha Pandurang Rahate and Another.
...Respondents.
Mr. Indrajit Kulkarni for the appellants.
Mr. Nikhil Wadikar and Mr. Niranjan Kandade i/b Mr Nandu Pawar for respondent no. 1.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : January 23, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Interim application has been preferred for bringing on record the heirs of deceased respondent no.1. Mr. Wadikar has been briefed to appear on behalf of the proposed respondent nos.2 and 3. He submits that appropriate instructions will be taken as regards 3rd respondent – Pandurang. However, he does not have any objection to the grant of application. Interim application is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within a period of four weeks.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Pravin Parshuram Rahate
Smt. Pratibha Pandurang Rahate
Pandurang
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court