Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioners despite prior adjournment sought for lack of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3 Wp-5473-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5473 OF 2023
Ashwini Ramkumar Kove and Another.
...Petitioners.
Versus
Smt. Lalita Shankar Kove and Others.
...Respondents.
Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar for the respondents.
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : January 23, 2024.
P. C. :
1. On the last occasion, time was sought by learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that there were no instructions from the petitioner. Today, also none appears for the petitioner. Dismissed for non prosecution.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Ashwini Ramkumar Kove and Another
Smt. Lalita Shankar Kove and Others
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court