Commercial arbitration petition adjourned after the respondent sought three weeks to file its affidavit in reply, arguing certain tribunal-record documents were missing from the court's record. Reply due by 12 July 2024; matter stood over.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJPARANJAPE PARANJAPEDate:2024.06.24 11:26:40 +0530
1 2-CARBP 41-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.41 OF 2024
Midaas Construction Company Private Limited … Petitioner V/s. Hindustan Construction Company Limited … Respondent
Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Luckyraj Indorkar a/w Mr. Tushar Mittal, Mr. Gaurav M., Ms. Ritika Singh & Ms. Risha Alva i/by Argus Partners for the Petitioner.
Mr. Deepak Kumar Thakur i/by Mr. Pushpak Chamariya for the Respondent.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 21ST JUNE 2024
P.C. :
time to file Affidavit in Reply to the captioned Commercial Arbitration Petition.
that the question of filing Affidavit in Reply does not arise since all material is placed on record of the Tribunal.
Mugdha
1 of 2
2 2-CARBP 41-24.doc
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
Mugdha
2 of 2
Midaas Construction Company Private Limited
Hindustan Construction Company Limited
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
