Adjournment order in an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The matter could not be heard for want of time and was stood over to 27/09/2024, with any earlier ad-interim or interim relief continuing until the next date. No substantive issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
ARB. APEAL U/S 37 OF ARB. CONC. 96 NO. 64 OF 2024
Chetan Giridharlal Bataviya ....APPELLANT V/S Competent Authority Through Deputy ....RESPONDENT Collector(la), Nashik And Anr.
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA J DATE : 19th September, 2024
P.C. :
Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 27/09/2024 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Chetan Giridharlal Bataviya
Competent Authority Through Deputy Collector(la), Nashik
Anr.
R. I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
