Disposed

Ald Automotive Private Ltd. v. Vaishali Transcarriers Private Limited

Bombay HC30 Jul 2024CARAP/86/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 11 application for appointment of an arbitrator under a Master Lease Agreement dated 14 July 2018. The arbitration notice went unanswered; the court found a valid arbitration agreement duly invoked and appointed Ms. Arti Raghavan as Sole Arbitrator, laying down standard terms of appointment.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Ms. Arti Raghavan as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties.

Ald Automotive Private Ltd. vs Vaishali Transcarriers Private… — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed by MULEY 1 29-CARAP-86-2024.doc MULEY SHUBHAM SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO PRAVINRAO Date: 2024.10.18 11:50:14+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 86 OF 2024

¶3

Ald Automotive Private Ltd. Vs.

¶4

...Applicant

¶5

Vaishali Transcarriers Private Limited ...Respondent

¶6

Adv. S. Das i/by J. Sagar Associates for the Applicant.

¶7

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 17TH OCTOBER, 2024

¶8

P.C.:-

¶9

This is an application filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator in respect of the disputes and differences that have arisen between the parties under the Master Lease Agreement dated 14th July, 2018.

¶10

Learned Counsel for the Applicant invites my attention to the notice invoking arbitration dated 24th August, 2023. He points out that there is no response to the said notice.

¶11

I have noticed that the Respondent has entered appearance, however, none appeared on behalf of the Respondent today. Even otherwise I find

¶12

1/4

¶13

Shubham

¶14

2 29-CARAP-86-2024.doc

¶15

from what is placed before me that there is an arbitration agreement and the same has been duly invoked. Thus, given the well settled position in law, I deem it fit to appoint an Arbitrator. Therefore, I appoint Ms. Arti Raghavan, Advocate of this Court to act as an Arbitrator in respect of the disputes and differences between the parties.

¶16

TERMS OF APPOINTMENT

¶17

(a) Appointment of Arbitrator : Ms. Arti Raghavan is hereby nominated to act as a Sole Arbitrator to decide the disputes and differences between the parties.

¶18

(b) Communication to Arbitrator of this order :

¶19

(i) A copy of this order will be communicated to the learned Sole Arbitrator by the Advocates for the Applicant within one week from the date this order is uploaded.

¶20

(ii) The Advocates for the Applicant will forward an ordinary copy of this order to the learned Sole Arbitrator at the following postal and email addresses:

¶21

Arbitrator/s Ms. Arti Raghavan

¶22

Address 205, Arcadia Building, NCPA Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021. Mobile 9004431865 Email [email protected]

¶23

2/4

¶24

Shubham

¶25

3 29-CARAP-86-2024.doc

¶26

(c) Disclosure : The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to forward, in hard copy or soft copy (or both), the necessary statement of disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Arbitration Act to Advocates for the parties as soon as possible. The Advocates for the Applicant will arrange to file the original statement in the Registry. If the statement is forwarded in soft copy, a print out of the covering email is also to be filed in the registry.

¶27

(d) Appearance before the Arbitrator : Parties will appear before the learned Sole Arbitrator on such date and at such place as the learned Sole Arbitrator nominates to obtain appropriate directions in regard to fixing a schedule for completing pleadings, etc.

¶28

(e) Contact/communication information of the parties : Contact and communication particulars are to be provided by both sides to the learned Sole Arbitrator. The information is to include functional email addresses and mobile numbers.

¶29

(f) Interim Application/s :

¶30

(i) Liberty to the parties to make an interim application or interim applications including (but not limited to) interim applications under Section 17 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 before the learned Sole Arbitrator. Any such application will be decided in such manner and within such time as the learned Sole Arbitrator deems fit.

¶31

(ii) The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to dispose of all interim applications at the earliest.

¶32

(g) Fees : The arbitral tribunal’s fees shall be governed by the Bombay High Court (Fee Payable to Arbitrators) Rules, 2018.

¶33

3/4

¶34

Shubham

¶35

4 29-CARAP-86-2024.doc

¶36

(h) Sharing of costs and fees : Parties agree that all arbitral costs and the fees of the arbitrator will be borne by the two sides in equal shares in the first instance.

¶37

¶38

Consent to an extension if thought necessary . Parties immediately consent to a further extension of up to six months to complete the arbitration should the learned Sole Arbitrator find it necessary.

¶39

(j) Venue and seat of arbitration : Parties agree that the venue and seat of the arbitration will be in Mumbai.

¶40

The application is disposed of in these terms. No costs.

¶41

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶42

4/4

¶43

Shubham

Ald Automotive Private Ltd. v. Vaishali Transcarriers Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ald Automotive Private Ltd. v. Vaishali Transcarriers Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vir Krishna Kotak vs Hl Terminal Holding B.V.

Acs Air Charter Service India Private Limited through Authorized Representative Mr. Ashish Wastrad vs Abbu Bakar Hussain Patel and Anr.

Joy Builder vs Union of India

N-Able Technologies Ltd. vs the Senior Examiner of Trade Marks, Mumbai

Asian Paints Ltd. vs Subodh Jain

Man Infraconstruction Limited vs Maitri Park Co-Operative Housing Society Limited