A commercial arbitration application was listed before the Bombay High Court; no substantive adjudication occurred and the matter was merely stood over to 19 November 2024 under the caption 'for dismissal'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mohite 9 carap79-24.doc
Digitally signed by TRUSHA TRUSHA TUSHAR TUSHAR MOHITE MOHITE Date: 2024.10.25 14:48:40 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.79 OF 2024
Dhirajlal Chhaganlal Mayani And Anr. .. Applicants
Versus
Nandi Tarpaulins And Ors. .. Respondents
None for the Applicants
Later on :
Mr.Atharva Jagtap i/b Mr.Sapre, Advocate for the Applicants.
Mr.Durgesh Rege i/b M/s.Lex Firmus, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.
CORAM: FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.
DATE: OCTOBER 25, 2024
P. C.
dismissal’.
[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.]
Page 1 of 1
Dhirajlal Chhaganlal Mayani
Nandi Tarpaulins
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
