Commercial arbitration petition where the petitioner's counsel sought time to complete service of notice. The court listed the matter for 28 November 2024 and directed correction of a typographical error in an earlier order, replacing "summons" with "notice".
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-CARBP-317-2024.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 317 OF 2024
Tata Motors Finance Limited …Petitioner Versus EMI Infrastructure Pvt Ltd …Respondent
Ms Shweta Marathe , i/b Jay & Co, for the Petitioner.
SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE
Digitally signed by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.10.19 11:21:51 +0530
CORAM: ARIF S. DOCTOR, J DATED: 18th October 2024
PC:-
Page 1 of 2
3-CARBP-317-2024.DOC
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J)
Page 2 of 2
Tata Motors Finance Limited
EMI Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
