Rajendra Manormal Mehta v. Prakash H Jain
Case brief
What is this about?
Interim direction in a Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act application: since the applicant knew only the shop address of the erstwhile partnership business and not the respondents' residential addresses, the court ordered service by Registered A.D./Speed Post, affidavit of service, and stood the matter over. No substantive ruling.
What the court decided
KVM
1/2
8 - CARAP 4 OF 2024.doc
Digitally signed by KANCHAN KANCHAN VINOD VINOD MAYEKAR MAYEKAR Date: 2024.07.25 18:57:55 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2024
Rajendra Manormal Mehta
….. Applicant
VERSUS
Prakash H. Jain & Anr.
….. Respondents
Mr.Ravi Kumar Mishra for the Applicant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should notice be served on the respondents by registered post before the section 11 arbitration application is heard?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rajendra Manormal Mehta
- respondent
Prakash H. Jain
- respondent
Anr.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
11 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court