Rajesh Mohanlal Bora v. Dhruti Amrish Vaidya
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
36-ARP-15-2024.DOC
Gaikwad RD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.15 OF 2024
Rajesh Mohanlal Bora Versus Dhruti Amrish Vaidya & Anr.
…Petitioner
…Respondents
Mr. Sandeep D. Shinde , for the Petitioner.
CORAM Dr. Neela Gokhale, J. DATED: 2nd May 2024
PC:-
1. The Petitioner seeks appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate the disputes that have arisen between the parties, out of a partnership agreement dated 25th April 2023.
2. By notice dated 25th July 2023, the Petitioner has sent an email to the Respondents invoking the arbitration clause, requesting the Respondents to participate in appointment of an arbitrator. According to Petitioner, there was no reply to the email invoking the arbitration clause, although there was some correspondence between the parties earlier. In these circumstances, he seeks appointment of an arbitrator.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition for appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a partnership agreement deserves acceptance.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be permitted to serve the notice on respondents by private notice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajesh Mohanlal Bora
- respondent
Dhruti Amrish Vaidya & Anr
Coram
Dr Neela Gokhale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court