The applicant's counsel submitted that the bail application was rendered infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 901
2024:BHC-AUG:27191
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 993 OF 2021
PAPPU MOHANRAO SURYAWANSHI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Deshpande Chaitanya C. APP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 19th NOVEMBER, 2024
PER COURT:
applicant submits that the application is rendered infructuous.
infructuous.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
marathe
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application is rendered infructuous by the applicant.
PAPPU MOHANRAO SURYAWANSHI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
