Allowed

Ashok Bapusaheb Deshmukh v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC19 Nov 2024ABA/439/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants anticipatory bail to the applicant. The court was satisfied based on the grant to co-accused, interim protection, and compliance with conditions. The order confirms previous interim protection.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; interim protection confirmed subject to conditions of attendance, non-tampering, and cooperation.

Ashok Bapusaheb Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra and… — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:27183

¶2

ABA 439/24

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

968 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 439 OF 2024

¶6

ASHOK BAPUSAHEB DESHMUKH VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶8

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.D. Gunale APP for Respondents/State : Mr. A.A.A. Khan

¶9

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : November 19, 2024

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

¶12

The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 32/2024 dated 23.2.2024 registered at Markhel Police Station, District Nanded, for the offences punishable under sections 420, 464, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the I.P.C.

¶13

The learned counsel for the applicant has pointed out that the coaccused persons in this crime against whom similar kind of allegations are made, have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Additional District Judge, Biloli vide order dated 6.3.2024. The learned counsel for the applicant further submits that this Court has granted interim protection to the applicant vide order dated 19.3.2024 and the applicant has cooperated the investigating agency as directed by this Court. The learned counsel submits that Sessions Court has rejected bail application of the present applicant on the ground that investigation was required. As the applicant has complied the conditions imposed by this Court while granting ad-interim

¶14

ABA 439/24

¶15

¶16

protection, I hold that anticipatory bail needs to be granted to the applicant.

¶17

In view of the above, the application is allowed and the interim protection granted by this Court vide order dated 19.3.2024 is confirmed on following conditions.

¶18

i] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required.

¶19

ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

¶20

iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

¶21

In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶22

It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

¶23

The application stands disposed of.

¶24

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )

¶25

ssc/

Ashok Bapusaheb Deshmukh v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Bapusaheb Deshmukh v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahamad Akhil Mahamad Khaza Khureshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Anil Damodhar Chidrewar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shubham Saibu Palle Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Vipul Fatchchand Shah vs Niru Fatechchand Shah and Anr.

Arfad Hanif Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Pappu Mohanrao Suryawanshi Vs the State of Maharashtra