In this bail application, the applicant sought leave to withdraw the petition; the application was dismissed as withdrawn by the court. This is a procedural order with no substantive ruling on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 939
2024:BHC-AUG:29158
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
939 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 660 OF 2024
PRANAV @ ANIL BALAJI WADDARE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Applicant :
Mr. Ramrao G. Nirmal h/f. Mr. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S APP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. Karne Gautam Jaywant
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2024
PER COURT:
leave to withdraw the bail application.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
marathe
PRANAV @ ANIL BALAJI WADDARE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
ANOTHER
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
