Bail application seeking withdrawal granted. Application remains disposed of as withdrawn.
Application disposed of on withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
942 BA 1925-2024
2024:BHC-AUG:29390
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
942 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1925 OF 2024
PAWAN PARAKASH DOODHMOGRE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Mr. Anil P. Piratwad – Advocate for Applicant Mr. S.P. Shirse – APP for Respondent, State Mr. Ashok D. Raut – Advocate for informant
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2024
PER COURT :
Sections 302, 324, 427, 34 of I.P.C. and Section 135 of Bombay Police Act. Learned Counsel for applicant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw present application.
withdrawn.
Pooja Kale
1/1
Pawan Parakash Doodhmogre
The State of Maharashtra
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
