Navnath Babanrao Dahihande v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
1933-2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:29492
945 BA 1933-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
945 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1933 OF 2024
NAVNATH BABANRAO DAHIHANDE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Mr. Vinod Y. Bhide – Advocate for Applicant Ms. V.S. Choudhari – APP for Respondent, State
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2024
PER COURT :
- Learned Counsel for applicant seeks leave to withdraw the
present application with liberty to file fresh application after the period of six months. I have not expressed anything on the merits of present application.
- The application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
Parties & counsel
- appellant
NAVNATH BABANRAO DAHIHANDE
- respondent
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Coram
ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court