Bail application for a serious murder offence where the body was dismembered. Court found the offence grave and sufficient incriminating material showing the applicant's involvement, and rejected the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
82-BA508-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.508 OF 2024
Amol Ananda Khamkar V/s. The State of Maharashtra
... Applicant.
… Respondent.
RAJIV BABARAOJI RAUT
RAUT Shri Satyavrat Joshi, Advocate for Applicant (thr. VC) Digitally signed by RAJIV BABARAOJI RAUT Shri S.M.Mangaonkar, APP for the State. Date: 2024.06.28 14:54:59 +0530
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATE : 27TH JUNE, 2024.
PC:
1 of 2
RRaut
82-BA508-2024.doc
and there is no progress in the trial. He further submits that considering the role attributed to the applicant in the F.I.R. he may be released on bail.
Accordingly, the Criminal Bail Application is rejected.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J)
2 of 2
RRaut
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant accused of murder under Sections 302, 201, 506 r/w 34 IPC should be released on bail despite delay in FIR and three years in custody.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Amol Ananda Khamkar
The State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
