In a specific performance suit, the trial court allowed the plaintiff's application directing the defendant to give an NOC for a water connection, citing water scarcity. The High Court declined to interfere, holding the interim direction caused no prejudice to the defendant, and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2024:BHC-NAG:4463
5.wp.2092.24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.2092 OF 2024
Smt Saroj Wd/o Giridhar Headaoo .Vs. Sau laxmibai W/o Wasudeo Kumbhare
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri M.C. Vaidya, Advocate for petitioner.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : 17/04/2024
C.L. Dhakate
2 5.wp.2092.24.odt
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed .
JUDGE
C.L. Dhakate
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court's order directing the defendant to give an NOC for a water connection over the suit property warranted interference.
Smt Saroj Wd/o Giridhar Headaoo
Sau Laxmibai W/o Wasudeo Kumbhare
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
