Ganesh Vitthal Mane v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail applications listed for hearing were adjourned for paucity of time to the next day, with any interim orders directed to continue until then.
Bail applications listed for hearing were adjourned for paucity of time to the next day, with any interim orders directed to continue until then.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-959
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3988 OF 2024
Ganesh Vitthal Mane ....APPLICANT V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
WITH
CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4651 OF 2024
In
Criminal Bail Appln. 3988 OF 2024
Sapna Krishna Jadhav ....PETITIONER V/S
State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR J DATE : 5th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 06/12/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Ganesh Vitthal Mane
Sapna Krishna Jadhav
State Of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court