Petitioners challenged trial court orders recalling closure of defendant No.10's evidence in a civil suit. The High Court, noting the defendant had filed his examination-in-chief affidavit under the subsequent order, declined to interfere and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2 40.wp302.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 302 OF 2024
Meerabai Nanaji Naitam and Ors. Vs.
Sanjay s/o Rajiram Bhandekar
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr. S.V. Sohoni, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Madhur A. Deo, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 17.10.2024.
This petition takes exception to the order dated 13.12.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Gadchiroli below Exh. 174 in Special Civil Suit No.17/2019.
Prity
2 / 2 40.wp302.2024
Prity
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court could recall the closure of defendant No.10's evidence and permit him to adduce evidence.
Meerabai Nanaji Naitam and Ors.
Sanjay s/o Rajiram Bhandekar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
