Roshan Bhaskar Naik v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The court adjourned the criminal bail application due to paucity of time, directing that any interim order, if granted, would continue until the next date of hearing.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 3664 OF 2024
Roshan Bhaskar Naik ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE J DATE : 23rd October, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 22/11/2024. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interim bail should be granted pending the next hearing?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Roshan Bhaskar Naik
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
MANISH PITALE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court