Kannan Murgesh Tevar v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Two bail applications, one filed by jail letter, adjourned. The State sought time to file a reply affidavit on the applicant's alleged role as gang leader; replies directed within three weeks and both applications listed for further consideration.
What the court decided
912_BA_3956_23 & 2096_24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3956 OF 2023
| Bhaskar Subramanyan Vellu | … | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| vs. | ||
| The State of Maharashtra | … | Respondent |
WITH
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2096 OF 2024
| Kannan Murgesh Tevar | … | Applicant |
|---|---|---|
| vs. | ||
| The State of Maharashtra | … | Respondent |
Mr. Shubham Singh, i/b. Vaibhav Ramchadra Gaikwad for applicant in BA/2096/2024.
Mr. Ashish Shukla for applicant in BA/3956/2023.
Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for respondent-State in both applications.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2024
P.C. :
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Bhaskar Subramanyan Vellu
- applicant
Kannan Murgesh Tevar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
19 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court