Aadil Javed Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application hearing adjourned; prosecution given additional time to file affidavit-in-reply.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32-BA-312-2024.doc
Arjun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO.312 OF 2024 Aadil Javed Shaikh …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
_______________________________________________________________ Mr. Mohammad S. Mulla, for the Applicant.
Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP, for the Respondent-State.
_______________________________________________________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : FEBRUARY 13, 2024
P.C.:
1. Mr. Gaikwad, learned APP seeks additional time to file affidavit-in-reply.
2. As a last chance time to file affidavit-in-reply is extended till 4th March 2024 .
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Aadil Javed Shaikh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Madhav J. Jamdar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court