The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the rejection of an application to amend the written statement at the appellate stage. The court held that the application failed to demonstrate due diligence as required by the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:5031
1 76-wp-4486-23.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition (WP) No. 4486 of 2023
Ramu Premdas Meshram
Versus
Ramabai Rameshwar Sarode and another
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Shri K.S.Motwani, Advocate for the petitioner Shri S.S.Bhalerao, Advocate for the respondents.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : 26th APRIL, 2024.
Heard.
SKNair
2 76-wp-4486-23.odt
[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]
SKNair
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court rightly rejected the application for amendment to the written statement at the stage of appeal due to lack of due diligence?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramu Premdas Meshram
Ramabai Rameshwar Sarode
another
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
