Dismissed

Ratna Vikram Koli v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC22 Jan 2024BA/302/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application rejected — Bombay HC BA 302/2024, Ratna Vikram Koli v. State of Maharashtra, 20 Aug 2024, R.N. Laddha J.; CR No. I-178/2022 Panchavati Police Station Nashik; trafficking/sexual exploitation of 12-year-old victim kidnapped and sold to co-accused; IPC Ss.363, 366-A, 370, 370-A, 376(2), 376-D r/w 34; POCSO Ss.4, 6, 8, 12 (S.4 max life imprisonment); Prohibition of Child Marriage Act

What the court decided

AI extract

Ratna Vikram Koli vs the State of Maharashtra… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.08.21 16:52:01 Chitra Sonawane +0530 901-BA-302-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

Criminal Bail Application No.302 of 2024

¶4

Ratna Vikram Koli Age: 37 years, Occ.: Housewife R/at Shriram Nagar, Behind Fauji Hotel, 10^th Mail, Ozar, Tal:Nihphad, District-Nashik (at present in Nashik Road Central Jail, … Jail road, Nashik) Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra (at the instance of Panchavati Police Station, Nashik)

¶5

XYZ Age:28 years, Occ: Bigari Kam, … R/at Rahul Wadi, Fulenagar, Nashik. Respodents. ---

¶6

Mr Prashant D. Patil for the applicant. Mr Arfan Sait, APP for the State. Ms Fehmida Ahmed for respondent No.2 (Legal Aid).

¶7

P.C. :

¶8

I have heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

¶9

By this application, the applicant seeks bail in connection with CR No.I-178 of 2022, registered at Panchavati Police Station, Nashik, for the offences punishable

¶10

Page No. 1 of 4 ____________________________________________ 20 August 2024.

¶11

Chitra Sonawane 901-BA-302-2024.doc

¶12

under Sections 363, 366-A, 370, 370-A, 376(2), 376-D read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code; Sections 4, 6, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, and Sections 81 and 84 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.

¶13

Mr Prashant Patil, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant, submits that the applicant has been in jail since 11 August 2022. The investigation is complete, and a charge sheet has been filed. The applicant has AIDS and poses no flight risk or threat to tamper with witnesses if released on bail. The learned Counsel emphasised that the applicant will not misuse the liberty granted to her. The co-accused, Kajal Gaikwad, was arrested and released on bail, and the primary allegations focus on co-accused, Priyanka Patil. Merely providing accommodation to the victim and co-accused does not imply the applicant’s involvement in the alleged crime.

¶14

Mr Arfan Sait, learned APP for the State submits that the offence is grave, particularly given the victim’s young age of 12 years at the time of the incident. The applicant has a criminal antecedent, and is accused alongside Priyanka, the main accused in the present case. Moreover, the applicant

¶15

Page No. 2 of 4 ____________________________________________ 20 August 2024.

¶16

Chitra Sonawane 901-BA-302-2024.doc

¶17

committed the present offence while already on bail for a separate crime, demonstrating a blatant disregard for the law. The applicant knowingly harboured the co-accused and provided shelter, further implicating herself in the crime.

¶18

Upon reviewing the application and the filed chargesheet, prima facie it appears that the accused committed in a well planned design. The crime is serious, and the applicant played an active role in it. The victim, only 12 years old, was kidnapped and sold to the co-accused, who subjected her to sexual exploitation. The victim’s statement details a series of incidents, and there is no indication of false implication. The crime is a grave offence against society, punishable under Section 4 of the POCSO Act with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. At the same time, co-accused Kajal was granted bail due to her young children who were about one and a half years and three and half years old. The applicant’s antecedents of committing such severe offences on multiple occasions outweigh her health condition, HIV AIDS, as a reason for bail. This aspect is highlighted in State of Meghalaya v. Lalrintluanga Sailo & Anr., 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1751. Given the seriousness of the offence and the prima facie material of the applicant’s involvement in the crime, she cannot be granted bail.

¶19

Page No. 3 of 4 ____________________________________________ 20 August 2024.

¶20

Chitra Sonawane 901-BA-302-2024.doc

¶21

In light of the above, the application is rejected and dismissed accordingly.

¶22

It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie, and the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with the law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order.

¶23

[ R. N. Laddha,J. ]

¶24

Page No. 4 of 4 ____________________________________________ 20 August 2024.

Ratna Vikram Koli v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Ratna Vikram Koli v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

1)SHRI. Sampat Rama Garad(D/H) 1A) Smt. Shakuntala Murlidhar Pawar and Ors. Vs 1) Shri. Shivaji Mansing Mane and Ors.

Poona Auto Works Vs Mr. Avinash Laxmikant Bhalerao and Ors.

Late Shri. Laxmanra Os. Shinde (Decd.Thr.Lrs) Shivaji Laxmanrao Shinde and Ors. Vs Smt. Radhabai Vitthal Waikar (Since Deceased) Represented Shri. Prakash Anant Valame

Jaya Korga Shetty Vs the Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Thr. F/North Ward Office

Sumati Yashwant Mathure (Since Deceased Thr. L/H.) Prakash Yashwant Mathure Vs Vasant Narayan Karkhanis (Since Deceased Thr. L/H.) 1A Pushpa Vasant Karkhanis

Draupadibai.G.Palekar Vs Sitaram.B.Palekar