Appeal from order challenging rejection of a temporary injunction application was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying civil suit had already been disposed of.
None; appeal dismissed as infructuous and pending civil applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 17 caa 200.15.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Application No. 200 of 2015 With
Appeal from Order (st) No. 3522 of 2015
Poona Auto Works
... since deceased through legal heirs Applicants v/s. Avinash Laxmikant Bhalerao & ors. … Respondents
None for the parties.
Digitally signed by LATA LATA SUNIL SUNIL PANJWANI PANJWANI Date: 2024.01.20 14:40:47 +0530
P.C. :
CORAM : R.N.LADDHA, J.
DATE : 19 January 2024
By the impugned order dated 24 September 2014, the learned
Additional Judge, Small Causes Court and CJSD, Pune rejected the
application Exhibit 5 filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 &
2 of Civil Procedure Code. Today, when the matter was called out
nobody was present for the parties. Upon perusal of the case status
(online) it appears that the Civil Suit No.506/2013 out of which
impugned order has arisen, was itself disposed of on 20 December
2016. In view of this, the Appeal from Order stands dismissed as
infructuous.
2/2 17 caa 200.15.docx
2. Pending civil applications also stand disposed of.
R.N. LADDHA, J.
Lata Panjwani, P.S.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Poona Auto Works (since deceased through legal heirs)
Avinash Laxmikant Bhalerao & ors.
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court