The Single Judge rejected the bail application for offences under Sections 394, 452, 506 r/w 34 IPC. The court cited the recovery of a stolen Mangalsutra under Section 27 of the Evidence Act and the applicant's 16 antecedents as grounds for refusal.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2812 OF 2024
Ajay @ Aajya Sharad @ Shreya Bhosale .Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr. Akash R. Pandey, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs. Geeta P. Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent - State
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.
DATE : 29.11.2024
P. C.
1 of 2
Anand
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.)
2 of 2
Anand
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail in view of the recovery of stolen property and antecedents?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ajay @ Aajya Sharad @ Shreya Bhosale
The State of Maharashtra
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
