Bail application under Section 439 CrPC by an applicant charged with murder of his father-in-law, with eyewitnesses and recovery of knife. The court found sufficient incriminating material, noted framing of charge and likely early trial, and rejected bail, holding it not a fit case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-ba-28-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.28 OF 2024
Ashok Gulab Kudale ... Applicants V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Tarav Sayed a/w. Mr. Aditya Parmar I.by Sana Raees Khan, for the applicant.
Mr. Pankaj Deokar, APP, for the Respondent / State.
Digitally signed by VARSHA VARSHA DEEPAK DEEPAK GAIKWAD GAIKWAD Date: 2024.10.01 17:23:24 +0530
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATE : 27th SEPTEMBER, 2024.
PC:
1 of 2
varsha
2-ba-28-2024.doc
(ANIL S. KILOR, J)
2 of 2
varsha
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant accused of murdering his father-in-law deserves bail under Section 439 CrPC despite eyewitness evidence and recovery of the knife.
Whether a successive bail application is maintainable without a change in circumstances after withdrawal of the first application.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ashok Gulab Kudale
The State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
