Bail application in a POCSO matter withdrawn by the applicant when the court was not inclined to grant bail. The court permitted withdrawal and observed that the trial court should endeavour to conclude the trial expeditiously per Section 35 of the POCSO Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
907-ba-2748-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2748 OF 2024
Trushant @ Aditya Suresh Gaikwad ... Applicant V/s.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Rishabh Tiwari a/w Chaitali Bhogle and Vivekanand Krishnan I.by Amol Wagh, for the applicant.
Ms. Geeta Mulekar, APP, for the Respondent / State.
Ms. Aditi M. Athawale, for the respondent no. 2, through legal aid.
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.
DATE : 26TH NOVEMBER, 2024.
PC:
1 of 2
varsha
907-ba-2748-2024.doc
(ANIL S. KILOR, J)
2 of 2
varsha
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Trushant @ Aditya Suresh Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
