Akshay Bhima Datir v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated the applicant had been acquitted by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
916BA2457-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2457 OF 2024
Akshay Bhima Datir ... Applicant. V/s. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent.
Mr Taraq Sayed a/w Samir Khan, Advocate for Applicant Ms Savita M. Yadav, APP for the State.
--------------------- CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATED : DECEMBER 06, 2024.
PC:
(ANIL S. KILOR, J)
1 of 1
RRaut
Akshay Bhima Datir
The State of Maharashtra
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court