Yogesh Anand Bhosale @ Sonya v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application adjourned due to paucity of time; interim orders to continue.
What did the court decide?
Adjournment granted to 27/01/2025; interim order, if any, to continue till then.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 2098 OF 2024
Yogesh Anand Bhosale @ Sonya ....APPLICANT V/S State Of Maharashtra ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE J DATE : 17th December, 2024
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 27/01/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Yogesh Anand Bhosale @ Sonya
- respondent
State Of Maharashtra
Coram
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court