Disposed

Smt. Neelam Ganesh Suryawanshi v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Home (State Excise) Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC15 Jan 2024WP/549/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged an order of the Minister of State Excise that confirmed earlier orders without affording hearing or recording reasons. Relying on S. N. Mukharjee, the Court held quasi-judicial authorities must act judicially with reasoned orders, quashed the impugned order and directed the Minister to decide the stay application afresh within two weeks.

What the court decided

AI extract

Smt. Neelam Ganesh Suryawanshi Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

19-wp549-2024.doc

¶2

VRJ

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.549 OF 2024

¶5

VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESHJADHAV Date: 2024.01.1518:12:54 +0530

¶6

Neelam Ganesh Suryawanshi … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents

¶7

Mr. Surel S. Shah i/by Mr. Vinayak R. Salokhe with Ms. Sampada Khanolkar for the petitioner.

¶8

Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for the State.

¶9

CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : JANUARY 15, 2024

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

This Court, by order dated 21^st December 2023 in Writ Petition No.15989 of 2023 directed the Minister of State Excise to decide stay application filed by the petitioner and, thereafter, revision expeditiously and in any event before 31^st March 2024.

¶12

Mr. Surel S. Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner invited my attention to order dated 30^th December 2023, which has confirmed order dated 8^th December 2023 passed by the Commissioner and order dated 4^th October 2023 passed by the Collector.

¶13

Once this Court directs the Minister to adjudicate the stay application and the writ petition, it is expected that the Minister shall exercise power in judicial manner. It is expected that he should afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass

¶14

¶15

19-wp549-2024.doc

¶16

reasoned order. Lack of reasons while exercising quasi-judicial order violates principles of natural justice. The Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in the case of S. N. Mukharjee v. Union of India reported in 1990 (4) SCC 594 has held that the old distinction between the administration and quasi-judicial order has not been obliterated. It is expected from the quasi-judicial authorities to act in judicial manner. Duty to act judicially includes opportunity to give hearing and pass reasoned order. The impugned order communicated by Desk Officer does not even refer to the date of any adjudication or any finding on merits.

¶17

Hence I, therefore, constrained to pass following order:

¶18

a) The impugned order dated 30^th December 2023 is quashed and set aside.

¶19

b) The Minister of State Excise is directed to decide forthwith the application for stay.

¶20

c) The petitioner shall appear before the Minister on 22^nd January 2024.

¶21

d) The Minister shall grant opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and after considering the case on merits shall either decide the application for stay or revision within two weeks from 22^nd January 2024.

¶22

It is made clear that no application for extension of time shall be considered.

¶23

The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

¶25

Smt. Neelam Ganesh Suryawanshi v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Home (State Excise) Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Smt. Neelam Ganesh Suryawanshi v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Prin. Secretary, Home (State Excise) Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Sanjaykumar Annasaheb Chavan and Ors. Vs Manugraph Employees Association , UNIT-1 and Anr.

Satappa Shankar Patil and Ors. Vs Taluka Cooperative Election Officer Nee Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies (Milk) and Ors.

Ravindra Ramchandra Mangore Vs Taluka Co-Operative Election Officer Nee Assistant Registrar Cooperative Societies (Milk) and Ors.

Maharashtra Engineering Plastic and General Kamgar Union and Anr. Vs M/S. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited and Anr.

Baban Trymbak Malode and Anr. Vs Smt. Gangubai Ramdas Malode and Ors.

Smt. Subabai Alias Subhadrabai Tukaram Kate and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Revenue Minister and Ors.