Bail application withdrawn after court indicated it was not inclined to grant bail; disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to move afresh if trial shows no progress. Interim application did not survive and was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 2 901.BA.1236.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1236 OF 2024
Rohan @ Dingya Sunil Chandanshive Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra Respondent
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2883 OF 2024
Yuvraj Hari Kolekar Intervenor
In the matter between :
Rohan @ Dingya Sunil Chandanshive Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent
Mr.Satyavrat Joshi i/by Ms.Sakshi S.Mane, Advocate for Applicant. Mr.C.R.Sonecha, Advocate for Intervenor. Mrs.S.M.Yadav, APP, for State.
PC :
Digitally signed by MANISHSURESHRAO MANISHSURESHRAOTHATTE THATTE Date: 2024.10.17 16:23:25 +0530
2 of 2 901.BA.1236.2024.doc
(ANIL S.KILOR, J.)
MST
Rohan @ Dingya Sunil Chandanshive
The State of Maharashtra
Yuvraj Hari Kolekar
ANIL S.KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
