Disposed

Gufran Ak Shaikh v. Inpulse Design Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Bombay HC19 Nov 2024ARP/140/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 11 arbitration petition for appointment of an arbitrator over disputes arising from purchase orders. Respondent consented to arbitration with contentions open. The Court appointed Mr. Dormaan Dalal as Sole Arbitrator, set venue and seat at Mumbai, and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Mr. Dormaan Dalal as Sole Arbitrator to decide disputes; petition disposed of on terms, no costs.

Gufran Ak Shaikh vs Inpulse Design Consultants Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

Digitally signed by MULEY MULEYSHUBHAMPRAVINRAO SHUBHAMPRAVINRAODate:2024.11.21 17:14:45 +0530

¶2

1 904-ARP-140-2024.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 140 OF 2024

Gufran Ak Shaikh

...Petitioner

Vs.

Inpulse Design Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

¶9

...Respondent

¶10

Mr. Faiyaz Khan i/by Adv. Ashraf Kapoor, for the Petitioner.

¶11

Mr. Siddharth Jagushte i/by Bellator Legal Services LLP, for the Respondent.

¶12

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

¶13

DATE : 19TH NOVEMBER, 2024

¶14

P.C.:-

¶15

This is a Petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and

¶16

Conciliation Act 1996 for appointment of an Arbitrator to decide the disputes and differences between the parties.

¶17

The matter was kept to enable Learned Counsel for the Respondent to take instructions as to whether the Respondent would be willing to submit their disputes and differences arising out of purchase orders to arbitration.

¶18

Mr. Jagushte, Learned Counsel for the Respondent fairly submitted

¶19

that his client is willing to go to arbitration subject however to keeping all rights and contentions of the Respondent open as also that the venue of the arbitration

¶20

1/4

¶21

Shubham

¶22

2 904-ARP-140-2024.doc

¶23

be Pune since the parties are from Pune as also the fact that the arbitration clause provides for the venue of the arbitration be Pune.

¶24

In light of the fair stand taken by the Respondent, I accordingly appoint Mr. Dormaan Dalal, Advocate of this Court to act as Sole Arbitrator in respect of disputes and differences between the parties on the following terms:-

¶25

TERMS OF APPOINTMENT

¶26

(a) Appointment of Arbitrator : Mr. Dormaan Dalal is hereby nominated to act as a Sole Arbitrator to decide the disputes and differences between the parties.

¶27

(b) Communication to Arbitrator of this order :

¶28

(i) A copy of this order will be communicated to the learned Sole Arbitrator by the Advocates for the Petitioner within one week from the date this order is uploaded.

¶29

(ii) The Advocates for the Petitioner will forward an ordinary copy of this order to the learned Sole Arbitrator at the following postal and email addresses:

¶30

Arbitrator/s Mr. Dormaan Dalal

¶31

Address 207, behind Bluemoon Chambers, 25 Nagindas Master Road, ner Welcome Restaurant, Fort, Mumbai 400 001

¶32

2/4

¶33

Shubham

¶34

3 904-ARP-140-2024.doc

¶35

Mobile 9503810380

¶36

Email [email protected]

¶37

(c) Disclosure : The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to forward, in hard copy or soft copy (or both), the necessary statement of disclosure under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Arbitration Act to Advocates for the parties as soon as possible. The Advocates for the Petitioner will arrange to file the original statement in the Registry. If the statement is forwarded in soft copy, a print out of the covering email is also to be filed in the registry.

¶38

(d) Appearance before the Arbitrator : Parties will appear before the learned Sole Arbitrator on such date and at such place as the learned Sole Arbitrator nominates to obtain appropriate directions in regard to fixing a schedule for completing pleadings, etc.

¶39

(e) Contact/communication information of the parties : Contact and communication particulars are to be provided by both sides to the learned Sole Arbitrator. The information is to include functional email addresses and mobile numbers.

¶40

(f) Section 16 application : The respondent is at liberty to raise all questions of jurisdiction within the meaning of section 16 of the Arbitration Act. All contentions are left open.

¶41

(g) Interim Application/s :

¶42

(i) Liberty to the parties to make an interim application or interim applications including (but not limited to) interim applications under Section 17 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 before the learned Sole Arbitrator. Any such application will be decided in such

¶43

3/4

¶44

Shubham

¶45

4 904-ARP-140-2024.doc

¶46

manner and within such time as the learned Sole Arbitrator deems fit.

¶47

(ii) The learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to dispose of all interim applications at the earliest.

¶48

(h) Fees : The arbitral tribunal’s fees shall be governed by the Bombay High Court (Fee Payable to Arbitrators) Rules, 2018.

¶49

(i) Sharing of costs and fees : Parties agree that all arbitral costs and the fees of the arbitrator will be borne by the two sides in equal shares in the first instance.

¶50

(j) Consent to an extension if thought necessary . Parties immediately consent to a further extension of up to six months to complete the arbitration should the learned Sole Arbitrator find it necessary.

¶51

(k) Venue and seat of arbitration : Parties agree that the venue and seat of the arbitration will be in Mumbai.

¶52

The Petition is disposed of in these terms. No costs.

¶53

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶54

4/4

¶55

Shubham

Gufran Ak Shaikh v. Inpulse Design Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gufran Ak Shaikh v. Inpulse Design Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vir Krishna Kotak vs Hl Terminal Holding B.V.

Neelam Ahlawat vs Dr Pramod Kumar Son Fo P M Ahlawat (Deceased)

Rohan Suresh Pardeshi vs Rakhi Rohan Pardeshi

Mr.Prashant Chandraant Shah and Ors. vs Borvili Chandra Vatika Co-Operative Housing Society Limited and Ors.

Goel Construction India Private Limited vs Thermax Limited

Gufran Ak Shaikh vs Inpulse Design Consultants Pvt. Ltd.