Dhampatraj v. Bhansali v Ramakant S. Biyani
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment notice for arbitration applications and petition; court stood over the matter due to paucity of time, continuing interim orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-32
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION LODGING NO. 31260 OF 2024 In
ARBITRATION APPLICATION 165 OF 2024
Dhanpatraj V Bhansali H U F ....PETITIONER V/S Ramakant S Biyani ....RESPONDENT
WITH
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 165 OF 2024
Dhampatraj V. Bhansali ....PETITIONER V/S
Ramakant S. Biyani ....RESPONDENT
WITH
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 300 OF 2024
Dhanpatraj V Bhansali ....PETITIONER V/S
Ramakant S Biyani ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA J DATE : 12th December, 2024
Page 1/2
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time, stand over to 17/02/2025. Interim order, if any, to continue till then.
( ASSOCIATE )
Page 2/2
Dhanpatraj V Bhansali H U F
Ramakant S Biyani
Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court