Lakshmibai Narayan Jadhav v. Jadhav Bandhu Construction
Case brief
What is this about?
A commercial arbitration petition was mentioned for hearing; since no notice had been served on the respondent, the court directed the petitioner to intimate the respondent and stood the matter over to the next date.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.08.27 15:10:57 +0530
1 39-CARBP 243-24 @ CARAP 157-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.243 OF 2024
Lakshmibai Narayan Jadhav … Petitioner V/s. Jadhav Bandhu Construction … Respondent
WITH
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.157 OF 2024
Mr. Zaid S. Ansari a/w Mangesh R. K. i/by Zaid S. Ansari & Associates for the Petitioner.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 26TH AUGUST 2024
P.C. :
- Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits
that no notice of today’s hearing has been served upon the Respondent. Since the circulation has been sought for by the Petitioner, it is fit that the Petitioner has to intimate the Respondent of the today’s hearing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lakshmibai Narayan Jadhav
- respondent
Jadhav Bandhu Construction
Coram
Arif S. Doctor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court