Arbitration appeal under Section 37 against a District Judge's order; since the order was already complied with by return of containers, nothing survived and the appeal was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2 8 ARA 52-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPEAL No. 52 OF 2023
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION No. 17791 OF 2023 IN
ARBITRATION APPEAL No. 52 OF 2023 .. Ashwini Anilkumar Adiparambil Prof. Appellant of M/s. Vinayak Marine and Logistics
Versus
.. Trans Asian Shipping Services Pvt Ltd, Respondent Mumbai, through its Authorized rep. Mr.Arun Kochakkan G.
Mr. R.P. Kadam, for the appellant. Ms.Bhohomika Markam i/b Lloyd & Johnson for the respondent.
CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATED : 22nd JANUARY 2024
P.C:-
1 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent.
2 The Appeal was filed challenging the order dated 30/6/2021 passed by the District Judge, Panvel, Raigad by way of an Appeal u/s.37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation, Act, and the respective counsel are ad idem that since the order is already complied with, by returning the containers to the respondent, nothing survives in the Appeal for its determination.
Tilak
2/2 8 ARA 52-23.doc
In wake of the above, Appeal is disposed off as
infructuous.
( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)
Tilak
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashwini Anilkumar Adiparambil Prof.
Trans Asian Shipping Services Pvt Ltd, Mumbai
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
