This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(9)coms-227-2021.doc
rajshree
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.227 OF 2021
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3251 OF 2021
IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.227 OF 2021
M/s. Aum Developers ] .. Plaintiff vs. Satish Ganeshdas Sapra & Ors. ] .. Defendants
Mr.Ankur Kalal for the Plaintiff.
Mr.Dishang Shah a/w Archana Jha i/b Piyush Shah for Defendant Nos.1 to 4.
Digitally signed by RAJSHREE RAJSHREE KISHOR KISHOR MORE MORE Date: 2024.01.24 12:42:15 +0530
CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE : 19th January, 2024.
P.C.
1] The learned counsel for the Plaintiff seek withdrawal of the Commercial Suit filed by the Developer, in the wake of communication received by him to the effect that the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties.
The learned counsel for the Defendants, the descending members, have no objection for the withdrawal being permitted, but his only apprehension is that, due to the withdrawal of the Suit they shall not be diluted of their transit rent.
1/2
(9)coms-227-2021.doc
2] The learned counsel for the Plaintiff make a positive statement that the transit rent is being regularly paid and it shall be paid and this obligation in any way shall not be affected due to withdrawal of the Suit.
Commercial Suit stand disposed off as withdrawn.
Refund of Court fees, if permissible as per rules, is granted.
[BHARATI DANGRE, J]
2/2
M/s. Aum Developers
Satish Ganeshdas Sapra
Ors.
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
