M/S Aum Developers v. Satish Ganeshdas Sapra and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The suit was withdrawn. No substantive issue was decided on the merits. The court allowed the withdrawal of the suit coupled with an assurance by the plaintiff that the rent obligation would remain unaffected.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the suit permitted. Refund of court fees granted if permissible.
What the court decided
(9)coms-227-2021.doc
rajshree
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.227 OF 2021
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3251 OF 2021
IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.227 OF 2021
M/s. Aum Developers ] .. Plaintiff vs. Satish Ganeshdas Sapra & Ors. ] .. Defendants
Mr.Ankur Kalal for the Plaintiff.
Mr.Dishang Shah a/w Archana Jha i/b Piyush Shah for Defendant Nos.1 to 4.
Digitally signed by RAJSHREE RAJSHREE KISHOR KISHOR MORE MORE Date: 2024.01.24 12:42:15 +0530
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the commercial suit could be withdrawn upon payment of transit rent assurance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. Aum Developers
- respondent
Satish Ganeshdas Sapra
Coram
BHARATI DANGRE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court