This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0209appp1546.24
1
Order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPP] NO. 1546/2024 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO. 511/2024.
Bhikaji @ Bhushan Kisanrao Shewalkar and others.
State of Maharashtra and another.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri P.R. Agrawal, Advocate for Applicants. Shri Badar, A.P.P. for Non-applicant No.1. Shri R.R. Rathod, Advocate for Non-applicant No.2.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2024.
Heard.
permission to file charge sheet. The investigation is
stated to be complete. We see no reason to refuse permission as sought for. Non-applicant no.1 is
granted permission to file charge sheet. Necessary
amendment be carried out within a period of four
Rgd.
Order
0209appp1546.24
2
weeks from the date of receipt of charge sheet. List the matter thereafter for further consideration.
disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellate court could grant permission to file a charge sheet without noting facts of a pending investigation.
Bhikaji @ Bhushan Kisanrao Shewalkar and others
State of Maharashtra and another
VINAY JOSHI
VRUSHALI V. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
