Application seeking quashing reliefs in a matrimonial dispute; the court indicated non-inclination to grant reliefs, and counsel withdrew the application with liberty to approach again if the matter is settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0209apl352.23
1
2024:BHC-NAG:9887-DB
Order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO. 352 /2023.
Dr. Mahesh Subhashchandra Innani. - VERSUS-
State of Maharashtra and another.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri J.B. Gandhi, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri N. Joshi, A.P.P. for the Non-applicant No.1. Shri A.V. Karnavat, Advocate for Non-applicant No.2.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2024.
After hearing the matter for quite some time, when this Court expressed its non-inclination to grant the reliefs, the learned Counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the application and requested to grant liberty to approach this Court again for quashing, if the matter is settled being matrimonial dispute.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Rgd.
Dr. Mahesh Subhashchandra Innani
State of Maharashtra
Non-applicant No.2
Vinay Joshi
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
