Condoned 35-day delay in filing criminal appeal against conviction. Allowed Criminal Application and disposed of pending appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
0209appa825.24
1
Order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPA] NO. 825/2024 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL ST.NO.7314/2024.
Saurabh Shivdayal Gupta. - VERSUS-
State of Maharashtra.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri R. Bhandarkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri A.A. Madiwale, A.P.P. for Non-applicant.
CORAM : VINAY JOSHI AND VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2024.
Heard.
condonation of delay of 35 days in filing appeal
against conviction. The applicant is in jail since
Rgd.
Order
0209appa825.24
2
07.12.2020.
delay is condoned. Criminal Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of.
Criminal Appeal No. /2024.
Heard.
respondent.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 35 days in filing criminal appeal against conviction should be condoned.
Saurabh Shivdayal Gupta
State of Maharashtra
Vinay Joshi
Vrushali V. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
