Disposed

Dilipsingh Harisingh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC13 Dec 2024APPLN/2957/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant granted bail in a murder case sought relaxation of a condition barring his entry into Nanded district. The court permitted entry on hearing dates of cases against him, one day prior to listing, with a bar on contacting witnesses or tampering with evidence.

What did the court decide?

Bail condition modified: applicant may enter Nanded district for listed court dates (one day prior), must leave after attending, subject to no witness contact or evidence tampering.

Dilipsingh Harisingh Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:29405

¶2

CA 2957/24

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

926 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2957 OF 2024

¶6

IN BA/493/2024

¶7

DILIPSINGH HARISINGH PAWAR VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶9

Advocate for Applicant : Mrs. Ashwini A. Lomte APP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar

¶10

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : December 13, 2024

¶11

PER COURT :-

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for respondent/State.

¶13

This Court vide order dated 5.4.2024 in Bail Application No. 493/2024 has granted bail to the present applicant in connection with Crime No. 159/2023 registered with Parali (Rural) Police Station, District Beed for the offences punishable under sections 302, 201, 120-B, 34 of I.P.C. This Court while granting bail has imposed the condition which is as under :-

¶14

“II (b) The applicants shall not enter in Nanded district till the conclusion of the trial.”

¶15

By this application, the applicant is seeking modification of the above condition imposed by this Court vide order dated 5.4.2024.

¶16

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that twelve criminal cases are pending against the applicant in the Nanded Court and for that purpose, the applicant need to attend the proceedings before the Nanded Court.

¶17

Considering the submission made above, I deem it appropriate to

¶18

CA 2957/24

¶19

¶20

modify the above condition. The applicant is permitted to enter the Nanded district for attending the cases which are filed against him on the days when the matters are listed before the Nanded Court. The applicant is also permitted to visit Nanded district one day prior to the date of listing of the cases and he shall leave Nanded immediately after attending Court.

¶21

Under no circumstances, the applicant shall not contact and pressurize the prosecution witnesses and shall not tamper with the evidence in any manner, failing which the bail granted to the applicant shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶22

With the above, the application is allowed and disposed of.

¶23

ssc/

Dilipsingh Harisingh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilipsingh Harisingh Pawar v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sankalp Ramdas Gadekar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Narendra Dayaram Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Lalit Vinayak Kuvar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shaikh Zubair Shaikh Subhan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Uddhav Madhavrao Rokade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Gorakh Bhimrao Gadri Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another