Allowed

Gorakh Bhimrao Gadri v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC13 Dec 2024ABA/1293/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Gorakh Bhimrao Gadri in connection with a case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act regarding seized foreign liquor. The court confirmed interim protection granted earlier and imposed standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

The anticipatory bail application is allowed with conditions to cooperate with investigation, attend police stations when required, and not tamper with evidence or influence witnesses.

Gorakh Bhimrao Gadri Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:29758

¶2

957-ABA-1293-2024

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

957 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1293 OF 2024

¶6

GORAKH BHIMRAO GADRI

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶9

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B.N. Magar h/f. Mr. C. C. Deshpande APP for Respondents-State: Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya

¶10

… CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 13.12.2024

¶11

P.C. :

¶12

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondents/State.

¶13

2] The applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No. 55/2022 dated 28/01/2022 registered in Dhule Taluka Police Station, District Dhule for the offences punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 80, 83, 108 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949.

¶14

3] It is the case of the prosecution against the applicant that the foreign liquor which was seized by the prosecution was to be delivered to the applicant by the driver of the vehicle which was seized on the highway. Apart from the statement of the co-accused i.e. the driver who has made a statement that the goods were to be delivered to the present applicant, there is no other material available with the prosecution connecting the applicant with the seized liquor or the vehicle. There is no telephonic conversation or any other connecting evidence supporting the case of the prosecution. This Court by order dated 29/07/2024 granted interim protection to the applicant. The learned advocate for the applicant submits that thereafter he has cooperated with the investigation.

¶15

957-ABA-1293-2024

¶16

¶17

4] In view of the above, the application is allowed and the interim protection granted to the applicant on 29.7.2024 is confirmed on the following terms :

¶18

i] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required.

¶19

ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

¶20

iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

¶21

5] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶22

6] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

¶23

7] The application stands disposed of.

¶24

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE

¶25

PRW

Gorakh Bhimrao Gadri v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gorakh Bhimrao Gadri v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sankalp Ramdas Gadekar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Narendra Dayaram Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Lalit Vinayak Kuvar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shaikh Zubair Shaikh Subhan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Uddhav Madhavrao Rokade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Dilipsingh Harisingh Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra