Allowed

Lalit Vinayak Kuvar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC12 Dec 2024ABA/1421/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge Anticipatory Bail Application where the High Court allowed bail to an applicant apprehending arrest for offences under IPC Sections 307, 143, 147, 148, and 149 regarding an assault case, confirming interim protection with conditions to cooperate with investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; interim protection from 21.8.2024 confirmed with conditions to attend police station, not tamper with evidence, and cooperate with investigation.

Lalit Vinayak Kuvar Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

ABA 1421/24

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

958 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1421 OF 2024

¶5

LALIT VINAYAK KUVAR VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶7

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.A. Raut h/f. Mr. N.N. Desale APP for Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs. M.L. Sangit

¶8

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : December 12, 2024

¶9

PER COURT :-

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondents/State.

¶11

The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 180/2024 dated 30.6.2024 registered with Nizampur Police Station, Taluka Sakri, District Dhule for the offences punishable under sections 307, 143, 147, 148 and 149 of I.P.C.

¶12

Considering the role of the applicant in the alleged crime that he used stick to assult the complainant and other accused have assaulted the complainant by means of iron rod and sickle and as the recovery is already made at the instance of other accused persons, this Court has granted interim protection to the applicant vide order dated 21.8.2024.

¶13

Investigation in the matter is appearing to be near to an end. The applicant has cooperated with the investigation.

¶14

In view of the above, the application is allowed and the interim protection granted by this Court by order dated 21.8.2024 is confirmed on the following terms :

¶15

ABA 1421/24

¶16

¶17

i] The applicant shall attend the police station as and when required.

¶18

iii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

¶19

iv] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

¶20

In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶21

It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

¶22

The application stands disposed of.

¶23

( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )

¶24

ssc/

Lalit Vinayak Kuvar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalit Vinayak Kuvar v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pranav @ Anil Balaji Waddare Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Ajay @ Ajit Hiralal Padvi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Pawan Parakash Doodhmogre Vs the State of Maharashtra

Omkar Vijaykumar Dhage and Antoehr Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sankalp Ramdas Gadekar and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Narendra Dayaram Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another